NOIDA (CoinChapter.com) — Pi Network’s introduction of Testnet 2 on Oct. 8, 2024, sparked renewed speculation about the long-awaited Mainnet launch. The new testnet update allows a select group of node operators to switch between Testnet and Mainnet seamlessly, raising hopes for a smoother transition to the open network.
Additionally, the drastic reduction in transaction fees to 0.0000099 Pi stirred excitement among users. With a deadline for KYC verification looming in Dec. 2024, the community hopes these developments signal progress.
However, independent analyst Toghrul Aliyev, also known as u/doctorbirdbee, shared doubts about Pi Network’s future that still linger amid accusations of inflated user numbers and delayed timelines.
Negative Cues and Scam Allegations Surrounding Pi Network
Toghrul Aliyev’s report provides an in-depth critique of Pi Network, highlighting several glaring issues. He draws attention to the discrepancy in Pi Network’s user base—while the platform claims to have over 60 million users, only 6.2 million wallets have migrated to the mainnet.
Inconsistencies in the Pi Network user numbers could raise doubts about the project.The substantial gap raises serious concerns about whether Pi is inflating its user figures to sustain interest in the project. Aliyev argues that this discrepancy could reflect a fundamental problem with the network’s scalability and credibility, casting doubt on its long-term viability.
Additionally, Aliyev pointed out Pi Network’s inflation problem, with the coin’s supply growing by over 106% in a single year. The rapid inflation threatens to dilute the value of Pi, especially in comparison to Bitcoin’s controlled inflation rate of 0.8%.
Pi Network supply inflation has outpaced most of its peers.Without sufficient demand to match the growing supply, Pi holders could see their coins lose value before the network opens. Such inflation could undermine Pi’s value proposition as a sustainable cryptocurrency.
Aliyev also critiqued the project’s so-called mining mechanism, which requires users to tap a button daily to “mine” Pi. This button-tapping bears no resemblance to traditional cryptocurrency mining, which typically secures the network and validates transactions.
Instead, it raises questions about whether Pi’s model prioritizes user engagement and data collection through ads rather than decentralization and security. The mandatory KYC process only deepens these concerns, especially since Pi’s aggressive collection of personal information could suggest a data harvesting scheme rather than a legitimate blockchain project.
Despite the anticipation around the upcoming mainnet launch, these red flags continue to cloud Pi Network’s future. Pi’s scalability and credibility remain in question without addressing these fundamental issues, potentially hindering its long-term success.
Community Replies: Defending Pi or Hoping for a Miracle?
Following Aliyev’s critical report, someone from the r/PiNetwork, likely the moderator, responded defensively. The user claimed that despite only 6 million wallets, Pi’s exclusivity could ensure its future value.
Moreover, the reply argued that concerns about inflation were overblown, noting that Pi’s total supply would not hit 100 billion anytime soon. The user also stressed the importance of community strength, suggesting that Pi could one day rival Binance Coin (BNB), dismissing the current IOU prices as irrelevant.
Those defending Pi Network acknowledged that Aliyev’s report was well-researched.However, Aliyev, responding under his Reddit moniker u/doctorbirdbee, countered that hope alone does not build value. He noted that data—not community loyalty—determines a cryptocurrency’s worth.
The analyst pointed out that Pi’s inflated market cap projections were reminiscent of Luna’s collapse and urged the community to remain cautious. In a subsequent reply, he dismissed privacy concerns surrounding Pi as overhyped.
Still, Pi’s KYC process could become a significant privacy risk, further eroding trust in the platform. With the testnet 2 launch news, the community has become more hopeful for a mainnet launch.
However, though the Pi Network community remains hopeful, Aliyev’s report serves as a sobering reminder of the hurdles the project must overcome to fulfill its promises. Without real progress on these critical issues, Pi Network risks being relegated to a footnote in cryptocurrency history.
The post Pi Network Mainnet Launch Speculation Grows—But So Do The Scam Allegations appeared first on CoinChapter.
